<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1658 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200867</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of a partnership firm regarding the denial of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2009-10 to 2011-12. The Tribunal held that the location of processing outside the bounded area did not disqualify the firm from claiming the deduction under Section 10B. Consequently, the firm&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the issue of charging interest under Sections 234B &amp;amp; 234C was considered consequential and not separately addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1658 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200867</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of a partnership firm regarding the denial of deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2009-10 to 2011-12. The Tribunal held that the location of processing outside the bounded area did not disqualify the firm from claiming the deduction under Section 10B. Consequently, the firm&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the issue of charging interest under Sections 234B &amp;amp; 234C was considered consequential and not separately addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>