<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200870</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summons issued under the Money Laundering Act, affirming the respondent&#039;s jurisdiction to conduct the investigation. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the legality of the summons and jurisdiction were deemed unsustainable, with the Court upholding the authority to issue such summons for investigation purposes under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200870</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summons issued under the Money Laundering Act, affirming the respondent&#039;s jurisdiction to conduct the investigation. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the legality of the summons and jurisdiction were deemed unsustainable, with the Court upholding the authority to issue such summons for investigation purposes under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>