https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200876 The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the pendency of a case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot obstruct the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The judgment clarified that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevails over the Arbitration Act, highlighting that the finality of an Arbitral Award for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is governed by the provisions of the Code, not the Arbitration Act. The appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:08:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200876 The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the pendency of a case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot obstruct the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The judgment clarified that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevails over the Arbitration Act, highlighting that the finality of an Arbitral Award for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is governed by the provisions of the Code, not the Arbitration Act. The appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200876