<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1304 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200880</link>
    <description>A general reference in a later memorandum to an earlier tender document does not, without clear intention, incorporate that document&#039;s arbitration clause under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Where the split contracts each contain their own arbitration clauses, and the record shows separate letters of award, distinct subject matters, and a separate corporate guarantee clause, the arrangements are treated as separate for arbitral appointment purposes. Under Section 11(6A), the court at the appointment stage is confined to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement, and the disputes were therefore to be referred to separate tribunals, including an international commercial arbitral tribunal for the foreign company-related disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1304 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200880</link>
      <description>A general reference in a later memorandum to an earlier tender document does not, without clear intention, incorporate that document&#039;s arbitration clause under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Where the split contracts each contain their own arbitration clauses, and the record shows separate letters of award, distinct subject matters, and a separate corporate guarantee clause, the arrangements are treated as separate for arbitral appointment purposes. Under Section 11(6A), the court at the appointment stage is confined to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement, and the disputes were therefore to be referred to separate tribunals, including an international commercial arbitral tribunal for the foreign company-related disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>