https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200865 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the detention order under Article 226 and Section 482 CPC. It held that the detaining authority's reliance on irrelevant material, specifically a statement lacking relevance to the petitioner's activities, vitiated the detention order. Relying on precedents emphasizing the importance of considering pertinent matters only, the court quashed the detention order, directing the petitioner's release unless required in another case, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 13:05:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200865 The court allowed the writ petition challenging the detention order under Article 226 and Section 482 CPC. It held that the detaining authority's reliance on irrelevant material, specifically a statement lacking relevance to the petitioner's activities, vitiated the detention order. Relying on precedents emphasizing the importance of considering pertinent matters only, the court quashed the detention order, directing the petitioner's release unless required in another case, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200865