https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200862 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, holding that the notification under Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, is not ultra vires the Act, and the Act itself is not ultra vires the Constitution. The Act applies to both virgin lands and dormant mines, and the provisions for compensation meet constitutional requirements. The petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g) are not violated as the temporary suspension of mining rights is considered a modification protected by Article 31A(1)(e). The petitions were dismissed with costs. en-us Sun, 10 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:51:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200862 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, holding that the notification under Section 4 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, is not ultra vires the Act, and the Act itself is not ultra vires the Constitution. The Act applies to both virgin lands and dormant mines, and the provisions for compensation meet constitutional requirements. The petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(g) are not violated as the temporary suspension of mining rights is considered a modification protected by Article 31A(1)(e). The petitions were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 10 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200862