https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200859 The Supreme Court overturned the Central Government Labour Court's decision, ruling that applications under s. 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act were not time-barred under art. 137 of the Limitation Act if the claim exceeded three years. The Court clarified that art. 137 applies only to applications to courts under the Civil Procedure Code, not to provisions outside it. Additionally, the Court determined that the applications were correctly filed under s. 33C(2) for computing holiday benefits in monetary terms, not under s. 33C(1) for dues under a settlement or award. The appeals were allowed, directing the Labour Court to proceed lawfully, and the appellants were granted costs and a hearing fee. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:21:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200859 The Supreme Court overturned the Central Government Labour Court's decision, ruling that applications under s. 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act were not time-barred under art. 137 of the Limitation Act if the claim exceeded three years. The Court clarified that art. 137 applies only to applications to courts under the Civil Procedure Code, not to provisions outside it. Additionally, the Court determined that the applications were correctly filed under s. 33C(2) for computing holiday benefits in monetary terms, not under s. 33C(1) for dues under a settlement or award. The appeals were allowed, directing the Labour Court to proceed lawfully, and the appellants were granted costs and a hearing fee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200859