<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 37(1) Royalty Payment Classified as Revenue Expenditure Due to Trademark License Agreement with No Long-Term Benefit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39141</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 37(1) - onetime royalty payment - revenue expenditure or capital expenditure - On an analysis of the agreement on record, there is no doubt that it was merely a trademark license agreement, which conferred no enduring benefit or long term benefit to the appellant. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:08:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 37(1) Royalty Payment Classified as Revenue Expenditure Due to Trademark License Agreement with No Long-Term Benefit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39141</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 37(1) - onetime royalty payment - revenue expenditure or capital expenditure - On an analysis of the agreement on record, there is no doubt that it was merely a trademark license agreement, which conferred no enduring benefit or long term benefit to the appellant. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:08:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>