https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359369 The appeals were dismissed, affirming the assessing authority's decision to add the shortfall in Bitumen delivery as income of the appellant. The Tribunal found the appellant liable for the actions of its agent, M/s Pawan Carrier, in the "Bitumen Scam" case. Despite challenges regarding the legality of the assessing officer's actions and failure to conduct proper enquiries, the judgment upheld the orders of assessment and the appellate authorities. The appellant's involvement in authorizing M/s Pawan Carrier's actions led to the dismissal of the appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. en-us Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359369 The appeals were dismissed, affirming the assessing authority's decision to add the shortfall in Bitumen delivery as income of the appellant. The Tribunal found the appellant liable for the actions of its agent, M/s Pawan Carrier, in the "Bitumen Scam" case. Despite challenges regarding the legality of the assessing officer's actions and failure to conduct proper enquiries, the judgment upheld the orders of assessment and the appellate authorities. The appellant's involvement in authorizing M/s Pawan Carrier's actions led to the dismissal of the appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359369