<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359365</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI partially allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original by the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi. The case involved a Courier Agency failing to obtain mandatory KYC documents and consignment authorizations, resulting in license revocation and a penalty. The Tribunal deemed the penalty appropriate but found the license revocation excessive, setting it aside while upholding the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal acknowledged the offense but modified the order, considering the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1476 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359365</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI partially allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Original by the Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi. The case involved a Courier Agency failing to obtain mandatory KYC documents and consignment authorizations, resulting in license revocation and a penalty. The Tribunal deemed the penalty appropriate but found the license revocation excessive, setting it aside while upholding the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal acknowledged the offense but modified the order, considering the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>