<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1463 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, who had reversed the entire CENVAT credit on common input services, was compliant with the rule requiring reversal of credit attributable to exempted services. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:09:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1463 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, who had reversed the entire CENVAT credit on common input services, was compliant with the rule requiring reversal of credit attributable to exempted services. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>