<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1454 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty against a manufacturing unit and imposing a penalty on the Director of the company. The Tribunal found that the evidence relied upon, which included documents from a third party, was insufficient to uphold the charges of clandestine removal of ingots. As the Revenue&#039;s case lacked corroborative evidence beyond third-party records, the Tribunal deemed the orders unsustainable and allowed both appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1454 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders confirming the demand of duty, interest, and penalty against a manufacturing unit and imposing a penalty on the Director of the company. The Tribunal found that the evidence relied upon, which included documents from a third party, was insufficient to uphold the charges of clandestine removal of ingots. As the Revenue&#039;s case lacked corroborative evidence beyond third-party records, the Tribunal deemed the orders unsustainable and allowed both appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>