https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359340 The tribunal found the appellant liable for confiscation due to using a third-party brand without following duty payment procedures for export goods. Despite the goods being intended for export, the appellant failed to comply with duty payment protocols, leading to confiscation. However, due to the substantial portion of duty-free agricultural goods seized, the tribunal deemed the redemption fines and penalties excessive. Consequently, the tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 10,000 and the penalty to Rs. 5,000, disposing of the appeal with revised terms. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:08:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359340 The tribunal found the appellant liable for confiscation due to using a third-party brand without following duty payment procedures for export goods. Despite the goods being intended for export, the appellant failed to comply with duty payment protocols, leading to confiscation. However, due to the substantial portion of duty-free agricultural goods seized, the tribunal deemed the redemption fines and penalties excessive. Consequently, the tribunal reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 10,000 and the penalty to Rs. 5,000, disposing of the appeal with revised terms. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359340