<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1450 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359339</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the demand for excise duty on goods repacked/manufactured before 01.06.2006 and goods cleared without invoices from 01.06.2006 to 03.08.2006. Confiscation of goods seized from various premises was partially upheld, with penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, set aside. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) findings as proper and lawful, leading to the cross objection by the assessee being dismissed as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1450 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359339</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the demand for excise duty on goods repacked/manufactured before 01.06.2006 and goods cleared without invoices from 01.06.2006 to 03.08.2006. Confiscation of goods seized from various premises was partially upheld, with penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, set aside. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) findings as proper and lawful, leading to the cross objection by the assessee being dismissed as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>