<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1212 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200854</link>
    <description>The judgment focuses on the maintainability of the petition and lack of opportunity for a hearing before admission before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The impugned order is set aside, and the NCLT is directed to reconsider with a hearing to prevent protraction of litigation. All parties are granted the opportunity to be heard, emphasizing a fair process. The judgment stresses expeditious consideration of contentions for a swift resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 19:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1212 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200854</link>
      <description>The judgment focuses on the maintainability of the petition and lack of opportunity for a hearing before admission before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The impugned order is set aside, and the NCLT is directed to reconsider with a hearing to prevent protraction of litigation. All parties are granted the opportunity to be heard, emphasizing a fair process. The judgment stresses expeditious consideration of contentions for a swift resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>