<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 11 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12819</link>
    <description>Prosecution for concealment and false verification under the Income-tax Act cannot survive when its entire foundation is the assessment order and the Tribunal has set aside that order, including the finding of concealment. Once that of the criminal complaint disappears, continuation of the prosecution becomes an abuse of the process of court. The Patna HC therefore held the prosecution unsustainable in law and quashed the order taking cognizance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:44:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 11 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12819</link>
      <description>Prosecution for concealment and false verification under the Income-tax Act cannot survive when its entire foundation is the assessment order and the Tribunal has set aside that order, including the finding of concealment. Once that of the criminal complaint disappears, continuation of the prosecution becomes an abuse of the process of court. The Patna HC therefore held the prosecution unsustainable in law and quashed the order taking cognizance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>