https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200851 The court ruled that architects registered under the Architects Act, 1972 are not mandated to obtain licenses under the Mumbai Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (MPMC Act). It held that the Architects Act provides a comprehensive regulatory framework, making additional licensing under the MPMC Act redundant. The court emphasized that the Central legislation of the Architects Act prevails over the MPMC Act in regulating architects. While architects are not exclusively entitled to architectural functions, qualified engineers can undertake such activities under Municipal Corporation regulations. The court partially granted the petitions, exempting architects from MPMC Act licensing but allowing engineers to engage in similar activities. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:04:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200851 The court ruled that architects registered under the Architects Act, 1972 are not mandated to obtain licenses under the Mumbai Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (MPMC Act). It held that the Architects Act provides a comprehensive regulatory framework, making additional licensing under the MPMC Act redundant. The court emphasized that the Central legislation of the Architects Act prevails over the MPMC Act in regulating architects. While architects are not exclusively entitled to architectural functions, qualified engineers can undertake such activities under Municipal Corporation regulations. The court partially granted the petitions, exempting architects from MPMC Act licensing but allowing engineers to engage in similar activities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200851