https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850 The court upheld the validity of the recruitment rules allowing non-registered architects to be promoted to the post of 'Assistant Architect' but directed the state government to cease using the titles 'Architect' or 'Assistant Architect' for individuals not registered under the Architects Act. The court emphasized that only registered architects can hold these titles and perform architectural functions. Additionally, the state was instructed to give preference to registered architects for positions involving architectural duties as per Section 35(2) of the Architects Act. The petition was partially allowed with specific directives to be implemented within four months. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:00:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850 The court upheld the validity of the recruitment rules allowing non-registered architects to be promoted to the post of 'Assistant Architect' but directed the state government to cease using the titles 'Architect' or 'Assistant Architect' for individuals not registered under the Architects Act. The court emphasized that only registered architects can hold these titles and perform architectural functions. Additionally, the state was instructed to give preference to registered architects for positions involving architectural duties as per Section 35(2) of the Architects Act. The petition was partially allowed with specific directives to be implemented within four months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850