<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 723 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850</link>
    <description>Service rules prescribing qualifications remain within the State&#039;s policy domain, but they cannot conflict with the Architects Act, 1972. The Act protects the title and style of &quot;Architect&quot; for registered architects and gives statutory preference to registered architects for architect posts, yet it does not prohibit non-registered persons from performing architectural functions. On that basis, recruitment rules allowing promotion of non-architects to a post involving architectural work were not invalid merely for repugnancy. However, the designation &quot;Assistant Architect&quot; cannot lawfully be used for a post held by a person who is not a registered architect, and registered architects must be given statutory preference for such appointments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 723 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850</link>
      <description>Service rules prescribing qualifications remain within the State&#039;s policy domain, but they cannot conflict with the Architects Act, 1972. The Act protects the title and style of &quot;Architect&quot; for registered architects and gives statutory preference to registered architects for architect posts, yet it does not prohibit non-registered persons from performing architectural functions. On that basis, recruitment rules allowing promotion of non-architects to a post involving architectural work were not invalid merely for repugnancy. However, the designation &quot;Assistant Architect&quot; cannot lawfully be used for a post held by a person who is not a registered architect, and registered architects must be given statutory preference for such appointments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>