https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849 The court allowed the petition and quashed the Annexure-3 notice issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, as it was beyond his jurisdiction to require the petitioner, who resided and worked outside his jurisdiction, to appear before him for an enquiry related to a missing person case. The court clarified that the Investigating Officer still had the authority to question the petitioner and record his statement but must approach the petitioner for this purpose. en-us Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:07:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849 The court allowed the petition and quashed the Annexure-3 notice issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, as it was beyond his jurisdiction to require the petitioner, who resided and worked outside his jurisdiction, to appear before him for an enquiry related to a missing person case. The court clarified that the Investigating Officer still had the authority to question the petitioner and record his statement but must approach the petitioner for this purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849