<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1292 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849</link>
    <description>Section 160 CrPC confines a police officer&#039;s power to require attendance to a person within the officer&#039;s own station limits or adjoining limits, and only if that person appears acquainted with the facts of the case. A notice directing a person residing and working outside those territorial limits to appear at the police office is therefore not sustainable. The officer may still question the person and record a statement by approaching them, but cannot compel attendance beyond the statutory territorial scope. The impugned notice was liable to be quashed, while the investigation itself remained unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1292 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849</link>
      <description>Section 160 CrPC confines a police officer&#039;s power to require attendance to a person within the officer&#039;s own station limits or adjoining limits, and only if that person appears acquainted with the facts of the case. A notice directing a person residing and working outside those territorial limits to appear at the police office is therefore not sustainable. The officer may still question the person and record a statement by approaching them, but cannot compel attendance beyond the statutory territorial scope. The impugned notice was liable to be quashed, while the investigation itself remained unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>