https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200843 The case involved a dispute over the availability of CENVAT Credit on service tax paid for "outdoor catering service." Due to conflicting views in different Tribunal cases, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution. The appellant argued for credit based on a previous judgment supporting eligibility for canteen services within factory premises. However, another Tribunal case provided a contrary perspective post-amendment to the CENVAT Credit Rules. The referral to a Larger Bench aimed to address the disparity and establish a consistent interpretation of the law on this issue, emphasizing the need for clarity in the application of CENVAT credit rules. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200843 The case involved a dispute over the availability of CENVAT Credit on service tax paid for "outdoor catering service." Due to conflicting views in different Tribunal cases, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution. The appellant argued for credit based on a previous judgment supporting eligibility for canteen services within factory premises. However, another Tribunal case provided a contrary perspective post-amendment to the CENVAT Credit Rules. The referral to a Larger Bench aimed to address the disparity and establish a consistent interpretation of the law on this issue, emphasizing the need for clarity in the application of CENVAT credit rules. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200843