<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the documents and decide the issue in light of the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The Tribunal emphasized that mere non-appearance of directors or meager income cannot be grounds to disbelieve the investments if sufficient capital and reserves are shown in the balance sheets. The decision of the CIT(A) was partially upheld and partially set aside for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the documents and decide the issue in light of the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The Tribunal emphasized that mere non-appearance of directors or meager income cannot be grounds to disbelieve the investments if sufficient capital and reserves are shown in the balance sheets. The decision of the CIT(A) was partially upheld and partially set aside for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>