https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359301 The court upheld the validity and enforceability of the arbitral award, dismissing challenges and affirming finality. It held that the non-signatory appellant was bound by the arbitration agreement under the group of companies doctrine. Jurisdiction was confirmed for NCLT to enforce the award through rectification proceedings under the Companies Act. The NCLT's order for rectification of the register was upheld, emphasizing its necessity to implement the award. The court applied the group of companies doctrine, affirming the appellant's binding to the arbitration agreement and award. Appeals were dismissed, confirming enforceability and jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:25:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359301 The court upheld the validity and enforceability of the arbitral award, dismissing challenges and affirming finality. It held that the non-signatory appellant was bound by the arbitration agreement under the group of companies doctrine. Jurisdiction was confirmed for NCLT to enforce the award through rectification proceedings under the Companies Act. The NCLT's order for rectification of the register was upheld, emphasizing its necessity to implement the award. The court applied the group of companies doctrine, affirming the appellant's binding to the arbitration agreement and award. Appeals were dismissed, confirming enforceability and jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359301