https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359299 The court upheld the validity of the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, finding no irregularity in the issuance. It clarified that exemptions under the Code of Criminal Procedure do not apply due to the overriding effect of the special provisions of the PMLA. Dismissing claims of malice, the court emphasized the necessity for the petitioner, a Senior Advocate, to cooperate with the investigation. The court directed the ED to reissue summons for the petitioner's personal appearance, stressing the importance of cooperation in prosecuting PMLA offenses. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:14:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359299 The court upheld the validity of the summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, finding no irregularity in the issuance. It clarified that exemptions under the Code of Criminal Procedure do not apply due to the overriding effect of the special provisions of the PMLA. Dismissing claims of malice, the court emphasized the necessity for the petitioner, a Senior Advocate, to cooperate with the investigation. The court directed the ED to reissue summons for the petitioner's personal appearance, stressing the importance of cooperation in prosecuting PMLA offenses. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359299