<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359298</link>
    <description>The court allowed the exemption for the delay in filing the leave to appeal petition, condoning the 62-day delay. The petitioner, APS Forex Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonored cheques by the respondent. Despite evidence presented by the petitioner, including original cheques and financial documents, the court found doubts in the issuance of the USD card and lack of proof for specific transactions. Ultimately, the court acquitted the respondents as the petitioner failed to establish their legal liability to pay the cheque amount, leading to the dismissal of the leave to appeal petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:11:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359298</link>
      <description>The court allowed the exemption for the delay in filing the leave to appeal petition, condoning the 62-day delay. The petitioner, APS Forex Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonored cheques by the respondent. Despite evidence presented by the petitioner, including original cheques and financial documents, the court found doubts in the issuance of the USD card and lack of proof for specific transactions. Ultimately, the court acquitted the respondents as the petitioner failed to establish their legal liability to pay the cheque amount, leading to the dismissal of the leave to appeal petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>