<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359297</link>
    <description>The Division Bench allowed the petitioner to withdraw the appeal challenging the order-in-original and granted liberty to challenge the show cause notice. The court disagreed with the Doctrine of Merger argument, emphasizing that the previous forums did not decide on the merits. The petitioner&#039;s argument for exemption under a specific notification was considered valid, leading to directions for the respondent to reassess the exemption&#039;s applicability based on the case&#039;s circumstances. The petitioner was instructed to respond within fifteen days, with the respondent required to issue fresh orders considering the exemption and compliance with its conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359297</link>
      <description>The Division Bench allowed the petitioner to withdraw the appeal challenging the order-in-original and granted liberty to challenge the show cause notice. The court disagreed with the Doctrine of Merger argument, emphasizing that the previous forums did not decide on the merits. The petitioner&#039;s argument for exemption under a specific notification was considered valid, leading to directions for the respondent to reassess the exemption&#039;s applicability based on the case&#039;s circumstances. The petitioner was instructed to respond within fifteen days, with the respondent required to issue fresh orders considering the exemption and compliance with its conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>