<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1404 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359293</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods and input services was denied for lack of supporting evidence, but the Tribunal found that the evidentiary gap required fresh examination because the purchases were routed through the Circle Telecom Store Depot and the receiving unit cited communication and personnel constraints. In the interest of justice, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with a reasoned order. The entitlement to credit and the equal penalty were not finally decided on merits and were left open for fresh determination by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1404 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359293</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods and input services was denied for lack of supporting evidence, but the Tribunal found that the evidentiary gap required fresh examination because the purchases were routed through the Circle Telecom Store Depot and the receiving unit cited communication and personnel constraints. In the interest of justice, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with a reasoned order. The entitlement to credit and the equal penalty were not finally decided on merits and were left open for fresh determination by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>