<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1395 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that their activities as commission sales agents did not fall under &#039;Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent Services&#039; for taxation purposes. The Tribunal determined that the appellants had correctly paid taxes under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; from 2004 onwards when commission agent services became taxable. Therefore, the demand for the period 2001-2005 under Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent Services was deemed invalid. As a result, the original decision was overturned, and the appeal was successful, providing the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 06:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1395 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that their activities as commission sales agents did not fall under &#039;Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent Services&#039; for taxation purposes. The Tribunal determined that the appellants had correctly paid taxes under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; from 2004 onwards when commission agent services became taxable. Therefore, the demand for the period 2001-2005 under Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent Services was deemed invalid. As a result, the original decision was overturned, and the appeal was successful, providing the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>