<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359271</link>
    <description>The court remitted the writ petition back to the first respondent for fresh consideration, instructing a reevaluation of the petitioner&#039;s submissions without mandating the surrender of the E-Transit pass. The court emphasized the need for an independent assessment based on all evidence provided, highlighting the authority&#039;s failure to consider relevant documents and solely focusing on the transit pass surrender.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 06:03:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1382 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359271</link>
      <description>The court remitted the writ petition back to the first respondent for fresh consideration, instructing a reevaluation of the petitioner&#039;s submissions without mandating the surrender of the E-Transit pass. The court emphasized the need for an independent assessment based on all evidence provided, highlighting the authority&#039;s failure to consider relevant documents and solely focusing on the transit pass surrender.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>