https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200839 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the dismissal of the respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police, was quashed due to a flawed enquiry that violated the principles of natural justice. The Court found that the respondent was denied a reasonable opportunity to defend himself, as crucial documents and witness statements were not provided, hindering his defense. The appeal was dismissed with costs, focusing on the denial of natural justice rather than the breach of Police Rules and Regulations. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200839 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the dismissal of the respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police, was quashed due to a flawed enquiry that violated the principles of natural justice. The Court found that the respondent was denied a reasonable opportunity to defend himself, as crucial documents and witness statements were not provided, hindering his defense. The appeal was dismissed with costs, focusing on the denial of natural justice rather than the breach of Police Rules and Regulations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200839