<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200836</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling that the agreement between the parties constituted an agency relationship and did not qualify for benefits under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200836</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling that the agreement between the parties constituted an agency relationship and did not qualify for benefits under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>