<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1376 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359265</link>
    <description>SC held that reopening under s.147 by issuing notice u/s.148 was invalid because the Assessing Officer had already considered how and to what extent deduction under s.10A of the IT Act should be allowed during the original assessment. The show cause notice demonstrated awareness of lack of separate books and how proportional allocation of common expenses should be made, so reassessment was merely a prohibited change of opinion. Matter decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1376 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359265</link>
      <description>SC held that reopening under s.147 by issuing notice u/s.148 was invalid because the Assessing Officer had already considered how and to what extent deduction under s.10A of the IT Act should be allowed during the original assessment. The show cause notice demonstrated awareness of lack of separate books and how proportional allocation of common expenses should be made, so reassessment was merely a prohibited change of opinion. Matter decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>