<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1375 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359264</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the second notice issued under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act. It ruled that the Assessing Officer had the jurisdiction and satisfaction to issue the notice and proceed with the block assessment against the appellant. The Court found the orders passed by the Income Tax authorities to be procedurally correct and legally sustainable. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1375 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359264</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the second notice issued under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act. It ruled that the Assessing Officer had the jurisdiction and satisfaction to issue the notice and proceed with the block assessment against the appellant. The Court found the orders passed by the Income Tax authorities to be procedurally correct and legally sustainable. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>