<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of cash payments as unexplained investments under section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had not conducted proper enquiries or provided corroborative evidence to support the addition, relying solely on presumptions. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition and the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the validity of the reopening under section 147, deeming it of academic importance. This decision set a precedent for similar appeals involving different assessees, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of cash payments as unexplained investments under section 69B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had not conducted proper enquiries or provided corroborative evidence to support the addition, relying solely on presumptions. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of the addition and the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the validity of the reopening under section 147, deeming it of academic importance. This decision set a precedent for similar appeals involving different assessees, resulting in the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>