<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 81 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12799</link>
    <description>The court found that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked sufficient reasons for the partial waiver of interest. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner of Income-tax for reconsideration with proper justification. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to approach the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner if applicable. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:02:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 81 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12799</link>
      <description>The court found that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked sufficient reasons for the partial waiver of interest. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner of Income-tax for reconsideration with proper justification. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to approach the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner if applicable. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>