<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359239</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of satisfying the criteria of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness in such cases, highlighting the burden of proof on the assessee and the importance of thorough verification and adherence to legal principles in income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1350 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359239</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of satisfying the criteria of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness in such cases, highlighting the burden of proof on the assessee and the importance of thorough verification and adherence to legal principles in income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>