<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1345 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal favored the appellant&#039;s classification claim under 9010 5000 for the imported ink jet printer, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of considering the functions and features of the printer, aligning with previous Tribunal decisions and supporting the appellant&#039;s argument based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1345 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal favored the appellant&#039;s classification claim under 9010 5000 for the imported ink jet printer, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of considering the functions and features of the printer, aligning with previous Tribunal decisions and supporting the appellant&#039;s argument based on relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>