<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1343 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the adjudicating authority for a fresh order specifically on the aspect of penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment clarified that penalties under Section 114AA cannot be applied retrospectively to cases where the cause of action occurred before the provision&#039;s enactment but emphasized that penalties should be based on the role and offense of the respondents in cases where shipping bills were issued post 13.7.2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1343 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the appeals to the adjudicating authority for a fresh order specifically on the aspect of penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment clarified that penalties under Section 114AA cannot be applied retrospectively to cases where the cause of action occurred before the provision&#039;s enactment but emphasized that penalties should be based on the role and offense of the respondents in cases where shipping bills were issued post 13.7.2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>