<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found that the training in foreign languages provided by the appellant qualifies as vocational training and is exempt from service tax, aligning with previous judgments on English language skills being considered vocational training. The Tribunal emphasized the targeted nature of the training for employment benefits and rejected the argument that general improvement in communication skills does not lead to direct employment opportunities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found that the training in foreign languages provided by the appellant qualifies as vocational training and is exempt from service tax, aligning with previous judgments on English language skills being considered vocational training. The Tribunal emphasized the targeted nature of the training for employment benefits and rejected the argument that general improvement in communication skills does not lead to direct employment opportunities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>