https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359225 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the imposition of penalties under Section 77 and 78, citing the appellant's genuine belief and substantial payment of service tax. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of extending cum tax benefits before determining tax liability, directing the re-quantification of the demand accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:29:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359225 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the imposition of penalties under Section 77 and 78, citing the appellant's genuine belief and substantial payment of service tax. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of extending cum tax benefits before determining tax liability, directing the re-quantification of the demand accordingly. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359225