https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359224 The Tribunal held that no service tax demand could be made against the Appellant as they were not providing services to M/s RMIL's clients. It was concluded that demanding service tax from the Appellant would result in double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized that imposing additional tax on the already taxed amount would be erroneous and unsustainable. As there was no element of fraud or intention to evade taxes, the extended period of limitation was deemed not applicable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, ensuring revenue neutrality for the parties involved. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359224 The Tribunal held that no service tax demand could be made against the Appellant as they were not providing services to M/s RMIL's clients. It was concluded that demanding service tax from the Appellant would result in double taxation. The Tribunal emphasized that imposing additional tax on the already taxed amount would be erroneous and unsustainable. As there was no element of fraud or intention to evade taxes, the extended period of limitation was deemed not applicable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, ensuring revenue neutrality for the parties involved. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359224