<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359221</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on export-related services was held admissible under Notification No. 17/2009-ST where the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case for the prior period. Terminal handling charges and allied export-related expenses were treated as already settled in favour of the assessee, so the refund could not be denied on that basis. For CHA services, the objection regarding non-production of the licence number and licence copy was rejected because service tax payment under the CHA category was undisputed and the invoices were on record. On commission, refund was allowed since tax had been paid despite exemption being available, and that fact alone was not a ground to refuse refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1332 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359221</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on export-related services was held admissible under Notification No. 17/2009-ST where the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s own case for the prior period. Terminal handling charges and allied export-related expenses were treated as already settled in favour of the assessee, so the refund could not be denied on that basis. For CHA services, the objection regarding non-production of the licence number and licence copy was rejected because service tax payment under the CHA category was undisputed and the invoices were on record. On commission, refund was allowed since tax had been paid despite exemption being available, and that fact alone was not a ground to refuse refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>