https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359220 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the refund claim on CHA services due to evidence of tax payment by the service provider. However, the claim for Service Tax on Fumigation/Sterilization charges was denied as the services provided did not align with the eligible criteria. The decision emphasized adherence to specific legal provisions and grounds for rejection, ultimately upholding the denial of the claim for Fumigation/Sterilization charges on exported goods. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359220 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the refund claim on CHA services due to evidence of tax payment by the service provider. However, the claim for Service Tax on Fumigation/Sterilization charges was denied as the services provided did not align with the eligible criteria. The decision emphasized adherence to specific legal provisions and grounds for rejection, ultimately upholding the denial of the claim for Fumigation/Sterilization charges on exported goods. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359220