<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by remanding the case to the original authority for review of the reversal particulars related to the payment of service tax on exempted services. The Tribunal held that once CENVAT credit is reversed, the demand for recovery of exempted service value cannot be upheld. The impugned orders were set aside to provide the appellants with a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and verification of the reversal particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1330 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by remanding the case to the original authority for review of the reversal particulars related to the payment of service tax on exempted services. The Tribunal held that once CENVAT credit is reversed, the demand for recovery of exempted service value cannot be upheld. The impugned orders were set aside to provide the appellants with a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and verification of the reversal particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>