https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359208 A challenge to attachment of property for Central Excise dues was considered premature where the Corporation had already sold the property after default, delivered possession, and executed a conditional conveyance deed reserving the first charge until all dues were paid. The Court noted that the grievance could not be entertained at that stage because the appropriate time to test enforcement of the claimed charge would arise only when the property was actually proceeded against for recovery of the excise dues. The appellant was therefore not entitled to immediate interference against the attachment. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359208 A challenge to attachment of property for Central Excise dues was considered premature where the Corporation had already sold the property after default, delivered possession, and executed a conditional conveyance deed reserving the first charge until all dues were paid. The Court noted that the grievance could not be entertained at that stage because the appropriate time to test enforcement of the claimed charge would arise only when the property was actually proceeded against for recovery of the excise dues. The appellant was therefore not entitled to immediate interference against the attachment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359208