<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1311 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359200</link>
    <description>The tribunal found interest legally chargeable under Rule 6(3A)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on the reversed amount. It clarified that interest was not applicable under Rule 14 or Section 11AA, but under Rule 6(3A)(e) specifically. Rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments, the tribunal held that interest became chargeable once the amount was reversed under Rule 6(3A). Consequently, the tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1311 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359200</link>
      <description>The tribunal found interest legally chargeable under Rule 6(3A)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on the reversed amount. It clarified that interest was not applicable under Rule 14 or Section 11AA, but under Rule 6(3A)(e) specifically. Rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments, the tribunal held that interest became chargeable once the amount was reversed under Rule 6(3A). Consequently, the tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>