https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359195 The appeal challenged the rejection of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on insurance policies under a Group Insurance Scheme. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing CENVAT credit on insurance premiums for dependent/family members of employees. Emphasizing the broad scope of 'input service' before the 2011 amendment, the decision aligned with precedent, including the Ramboll Imisoft Pvt. Ltd. case. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in the final judgment on 06/04/2018. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359195 The appeal challenged the rejection of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on insurance policies under a Group Insurance Scheme. The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing CENVAT credit on insurance premiums for dependent/family members of employees. Emphasizing the broad scope of 'input service' before the 2011 amendment, the decision aligned with precedent, including the Ramboll Imisoft Pvt. Ltd. case. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in the final judgment on 06/04/2018. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359195