<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1303 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after finding that the previous decisions lacked examination of the items&#039; use for Cenvat Credit eligibility. The appeal was allowed through remand, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly, setting aside the Adjudication Order disallowing the Cenvat Credit on structural items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1303 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after finding that the previous decisions lacked examination of the items&#039; use for Cenvat Credit eligibility. The appeal was allowed through remand, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly, setting aside the Adjudication Order disallowing the Cenvat Credit on structural items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>