https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200833 Leave to appeal was granted where counsel agreed that the question raised was identical to the issue already referred to a Larger Bench in Civil Appeal No. 1117 of 2010 and connected matters. Because the same question of law was pending before the Larger Bench, the Court directed that the present appeal be tagged with that appeal for joint consideration. The operative effect was a procedural consolidation of related appeals for determination together under the earlier reference. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:27:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200833 Leave to appeal was granted where counsel agreed that the question raised was identical to the issue already referred to a Larger Bench in Civil Appeal No. 1117 of 2010 and connected matters. Because the same question of law was pending before the Larger Bench, the Court directed that the present appeal be tagged with that appeal for joint consideration. The operative effect was a procedural consolidation of related appeals for determination together under the earlier reference. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200833