<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1343 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200830</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s use of clinker in duty exempted cement for clearance to a Special Economic Zone does not incur duty liability. The decision was based on the provisions of the SEZ Act and a relevant notification, which exempted the appellant&#039;s clinker manufacturing process and clarified that supplies to SEZ are not subject to duty under the SEZ Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1343 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200830</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant&#039;s use of clinker in duty exempted cement for clearance to a Special Economic Zone does not incur duty liability. The decision was based on the provisions of the SEZ Act and a relevant notification, which exempted the appellant&#039;s clinker manufacturing process and clarified that supplies to SEZ are not subject to duty under the SEZ Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>