<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200826</link>
    <description>A complaint under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act must plead the essential ingredients of the alleged offences with specificity. For Section 54(1)(a), it must allege that women were employed or permitted to be employed by the licensed vendor in violation of Section 25(2) and that the conduct occurred in the part of the premises where liquor was consumed by the public; the text states these averments were absent. For Section 57(c), it must identify a licence condition that was wilfully breached; the text states no such condition was specified. Where the allegations do not constitute any offence, the High Court may exercise inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash the cognizance order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200826</link>
      <description>A complaint under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act must plead the essential ingredients of the alleged offences with specificity. For Section 54(1)(a), it must allege that women were employed or permitted to be employed by the licensed vendor in violation of Section 25(2) and that the conduct occurred in the part of the premises where liquor was consumed by the public; the text states these averments were absent. For Section 57(c), it must identify a licence condition that was wilfully breached; the text states no such condition was specified. Where the allegations do not constitute any offence, the High Court may exercise inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash the cognizance order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>